ADR Section St. Pete Retreat

Please join fellow members of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Section of The Florida Bar later this month in beautiful St. Pete at the Hyatt Place–St. Petersburg-Downtown for their annual retreat weekend. This active section which includes certified civil and family mediators, qualified arbitrators and other attorneys looking to learn more about being effective utilizing ADR processes is now celebrating its fifteenth year! I have been honored to serve as an emeritus member of the Executive Council after serving two terms. This is a great opportunity to become more involved in the leadership of the profession and to help guide processes such as important rulemaking at the state level. The tentative schedule for the program is as follows: Friday, August 22, 2025: Happy Hour at Hyatt Place (4:00 p.m. -6:00 p.m.) Dinner at Oak and Stone (following Happy Hour) Saturday, August 23, 2025: CLE/CME Presentations at Hyatt Place (9:00 a.m. -11:00 a.m.) Lunch Provided at Hyatt Place (12:00 p.m. – 1:00 p.m.) Executive Council Meeting (1:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m.) Off-Site Dinner and/or Team Event (TBD) This year's event will include some focus on the evolution of Nonbinding Arbitration in Florida that is increasingly being employed by many circuits to cull the court dockets still backlogged from the pandemic. Special rate room block booking cutoff is August 11th. More information here-- https://flabaradr.com/events/the-adr-section-annual-retreat/ Sign form up here-- https://tinyurl.com/ecbk94zf

More Civil Rules Proposals Affecting Nonbinding Arb

The Florida Civil Procedure Rules Committee is proposing amendments to conform to changes to the Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration adopted earlier this year in SC2023-1401, In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration, including discovery Rule 1.280 to track Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(A)(iii) and for consistency between subdivisions. As pertains to ADR, Rule 1.700, Rules Common to Mediation and Arbitration, allows the use of both audio and video communication technology in mediation and arbitration, if the parties do not want to appear in person, which is the default. Under that rule, a judge may enter an order referring all or any partof a case to mediation or arbitration, unless prohibited by law. The parties to any case may agree to mediate or arbitrate any issue at any time. Except as provided in this rule, mediation and arbitration must be conducted in person. The judge may order, or the parties may stipulate, that the mediation or arbitration may be conducted through the use of communication technology. The communication technology must include both audio and video unless all parties stipulate or the judge finds cause. Changes to Rule 1.820, Hearing Procedures for Nonbinding Arbitration, purportedly make it easier to address unintended appellate court interpretation of a recent amendment to this provision (People’s Trust Ins. Co. v.Hernandez, 4D2024-3274) and to better align the rule with existing electronic filing practices. For instance, proposed Rule 1.820 (h) is suggesting the nomenclature be simply a "Request for Trial" thereby elimimating the previous process entitled what used to be called a request for trial de novo and then, more recently, a notice of rejection of arbitration decision. Additionally, if a Request for Trial is filed within 20 days of the service of the arbitration decision, the arbitration decision must not be filed until necessary to enforce the provisions of Section 44.103, Florida Statutes, after the entry of judgment. This change seems inconsistent with the routine filing of decisions under seal until such time as the parties accept an award. The Florida Bar ADR Section is considering filing a comment on the language which may require requesting an extension from the Supreme Court of Florida, but public comments are due by August 18, 2025. See more here-- https://tinyurl.com/5d25e337

AI Hallucinations Abound

Since the advent of generative artificial intelligence and its ever-evolving use in the legal research arena, there have been troubling episodes of hallucinations with fake case citations catching both lawyers and judges off guard. We started scratching our heads a couple of years ago following the wide public release of large language models and a well-publicized federal aviation case resulting in $5,000 of sanctions. Dozens more expensive examples of false statements to courts followed, though recently America's largest injury firm was only hit with a grand. Some got pleadings stricken, public reprimands, disqualification or joint and several sanctions under Rule 11, while others were referred their state bar for disciplinary proceedings and of course, all were embarrassed. This summer, a state appellate court even caught a trial judge who decided a case based on fake law and a federal judge in a securities case had to be told by a white shoe law firm that her opinion contained hallucinated cases resulting in a withdrawn opinion. As Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts wisely said, "Any use of AI requires caution and humility." It is interesting to note that we are not alone in the world with this problem, though the USA leads with at least 136 such incidents to date. Some counsel fared better by being contrite and falling on their proverbial sword, being bench-slapped with smaller sanctions. Many more seemed rather recalcitrant and argued mistaken briefs were filed or that their work product (despite being vendor checked through subscription with well-known legal service providers) should somehow save them from the same fate. Now these cases have been conveniently catalogued-- on an almost daily basis-- by Damien Charlotin at this handy hallucination link-- https://www.damiencharlotin.com/hallucinations/

11th Cir.: Arb Clickwraps Valid in Fla.

The 100 year-old Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) requires courts to enforce arbitration agreements according to their terms. But arbitration is a matter of contract, and the FAA does not allow a court to compel arbitration unless it is satisfied that the parties agreed to arbitrate. If the existence of the agreement is not genuinely disputed, the court must compel arbitration.These principles apply equally to so-called “clickwrap” agreements, in which users assent to terms by clicking a button near a disclosure referencing those terms. Under Florida law, the central question is whether the parties mutually assented to be bound. In the Eleventh Circuit's recent ruling, Lamonaco v. Experian Inform. Sols., Inc., 2025 WL 1831283 (11th Cir. July 3, 2025), because Experian submitted competent and unrebutted evidence of an agreement to arbitrate, the federal district court for the Middle District of Florida erred in denying its motion to compel arbitration. Relying heavily on Bazemore v. Jefferson Capital Systems, LLC, 837 F3d. 1325 (11th Cir. 2016), appellee argued that a declaration was insufficient to prove that she had agreed to arbitrate her claims. She also claimed that Experian had by its litigation conduct waived its right to insist on arbitration. The district court denied the motion to compel arbitration, finding that the declaration submitted in support of the motion offered only conclusory assertions and rested on business records not attached to the declaration. The district court also held that Experian had waived its right to insist on arbitration which it then appealed. The Eleventh Circuit reversed, holding that the district court erred on both issues. Because the arbitration agreement delegated to the arbitrator “all disputes over the interpretation, applicability, or enforceability of the arbitration agreement,” and an amendment to the agreement stated specifically that the delegation included questions of waiver, whether Experian waived its arbitration right was for the arbitrator to decide. See more here-- https://tinyurl.com/2u45se7k and https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/202411270.pdf

Join Me at DRC on 8/1 for AI!

Registration is now open for the 32nd Florida Dispute Resolution Conference where over a thousand certified mediators gain continuing education and the latest info on the profession. The Florida Dispute Resolution Center (DRC) is a unit of the Office of the State Courts Administrator under the Supreme Court of Florida. The Supreme Court of Florida, through the DRC, certifies mediators in the areas of county court, circuit court, family, dependency, and appellate. The DRC also provides staff to its boards and committees, certifies mediation training programs, provides basic county mediation training and advanced continuing mediator education, and assists the local courts throughout Florida with alternative dispute resolution. I have the honor of being asked by the DRC to join some of my esteemed colleagues from the Executive Council of The Florida Bar's Alternative Dispute Resolution Section to give the 2025 opening plenary session. We will introduce the manner in which Artificial Intelligence (AI) has evolved generally for dispute resolution and how it is employed specifically in mediation. Along with my distinguished panelists, we will share advantages and disadvantages that arise with the use of AI, as well as specific ethical and pragmatic challenges mediators face in this rapidly-evolving environment. This year's conference will be held virtually on Friday, August 1, 2025 from 9:00 am until 5:15 pm. On the day of the conference, you will be eligible for up to 6.3 hours of continuing education, with 1.2 hours of mediator ethics for certified mediators. Virtual attendees will be able to view all conference recordings for 60 days post-conference and will be eligible for additional hours of continuing education. See more here-https://drcconferences.swoogo.com/2025conference/sessions

NBA in FLA

Some practitioners did not take note of the change last summer that rejecting a nonbinding arbitration award went from filing for trial de novo to requiring including notice requesting rejection. Effective July 1, 2024, amended rule 1.820(h) requires a notice of rejection of the arbitration decision and request for trial. This was done to to clarify the process for rejecting an arbitrator’s decision and requesting a trial de novo. Under the amended rule, an arbitration decision is deemed rejected only if such request is filed with the court within 20 days of service of the arbitrator’s written decision. See In re Amends. to Fla. Rules of Civ. Proc., 386 So. 3d 876, 878 (Fla. 2024). In a recent Fourth District Court of Appeal case, it was held that a request for trial de novo, which does not also include a notice of rejection of the arbitration decision, does not comply with amended rule 1.820(h). If a notice of rejection of the arbitration decision and request for trial is not timely made, the decision must be referred to the presiding judge, who must enter such orders and judgments as may be required to carry out the terms of the decision as provided by Section 44.103(5), Florida Statutes. See more here-- https://tinyurl.com/2rbdjdes

May Mediation Mentoring Academy

Whether you are a veteran neutral, new to dispute resolution practice, or an attorney representing clients in mediation or arbitration, our upcoming Advanced Mediation Techniques Mentoring Academy next month in Tampa on May 2-3, 2025 can help you enhance your negotiation and mediation skills. Sign up now as this great interactive program featuring some of the best mediators in Florida is limited in size of participants and is only offered by us every other year! Practice techniques and receive live, immediate feedback to make you a better mediator. Gain appropriate, ethical mediation techniques to address a complex litigation case. Advance your experience in handling hurdles that can appear in complex cases. Improve how you establish “mediation momentum” and move the parties forward to close the deal. Get pro tips on testing party-imposed limitations without overstepping ethical boundaries to bring the parties to an acceptable resolution. Learn technology tips for facilitating the parties’ agreement that can enhance your practice and improve your clients’ experiences. Increase your statewide network of mentors and co-mediators, all while enjoying a stimulating, interactive opportunity to expand your skills in a risk-free environment. See more here-- https://member.floridabar.org/s/lt-event?id=a1RWQ000004oK4T2AU and https://flabaradr.com/mentoring-academy/