Orlando Mediator Blog Now Top 3!

Since 2010, the aim of this blog is simply to bring awareness to the profession of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) through assorted entries about mediation, arbitration and other forms of acting as a neutral online. Once again, Orlando Mediator blog received the honor of being named top among dispute resolution blogs out of the 80 best ranked on the web by traffic, social media followers, domain authority and freshness. I'm still maintaining some good company on this list with established dispute resolution blogs around the world that actually have paid professional writers and journalists. Orlando Mediator is recognized by Feedspot along with such distinguished blogs published by big names like Kluwer and Thomson Reuters and even above those by prominent ADR organizations like the American Arbitration Association (AAA), The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (Ciarb), ODR.com, Miles, NAM, ADR times and International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution (CPR). Feedspot's experts chose Orlando Mediator for what their founder calls the most comprehensive list of Dispute Resolution Blogs on the planet! Feedspot says it is the internet’s largest human curated database of bloggers and podcasts. Their list combines RSS feeds allowing users to keep track of many different websites in a single news aggregator. I am humbled again to know this labor of love for my chosen field of peacemaking is appreciated. I do enjoy keeping everyone informed on the latest trends and happenings in mediation and related fields through this outlet. Thanks again for your readership and support in 2026! https://rss.feedspot.com/dispute_resolution_rss_feeds/

FL Nonbinding Arbitration Rules Clarification

The standing Civil Rules Committee of The Florida Bar seeks to amend Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.820 after confusion arising from People’s Trust Ins. Co. v. Hernandez, 413 So. 3d 127 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025) where the Fourth District Court of Appeal interpreted nonbinding arbitration notice language as requiring a party to state both that it was “rejecting” the arbitration decision and that it was “requesting a trial” in the written filing. In Hernandez, while the party filed a request for trial de novo, the request did not include language that the party was “rejecting” the arbitration award. The court said the request for trial de novo did not strictly comply with Rule 1.820 (h) and was therefore ineffective. When the Civil Rules Committee last proposed amending Rule 1.820, it was not their intention to create a requirement to use “magic words” to reject an arbitration award-- it was to create a requirement that a request for trial de novo be accomplished by a written filing. Members of the committee now agree that it is duplicative and unnecessary for a party to say both that the arbitration award is being rejected and that a trial de novo is being requested. Rather, it is implicit that a request for a trial de novo is a rejection of the arbitration award. There was also a concern that article I, section 22, Florida Constitution states “[t]he right of trial by jury shall be secure to all and remain inviolate” and a procedural rule should not invade that right by creating a trap for the unwary. To address the Hernandez decision’s interpretation, Civil Rules proposes amending subdivision (h) to clarify that only a written request for trial need be filed; the filing does not have to be a “notice of rejection of the arbitration decision and request for trial.” This is now an official rules amendment petition case pending before the Florida Supreme Court found here-- https://acis.flcourts.gov/portal/court/68f021c4-6a44-4735-9a76-5360b2e8af13/case/14463DCF-4E3D-428D-B801-B5BC1DC7570A and case that brought about the need for clarification-- https://law.justia.com/cases/florida/fourth-district-court-of-appeal/2025/4d2024-3274.html

Orlando Film Premiere: Voice of the Mediation Client 1/21!

Join us at the Orange County Bar Association in Orlando on January 21, 2026 at noon for a film screening and esteemed panel with lunch included! This program is a collaboration of OCBA’s ADR Committee and the ADR Section of The Florida Bar that have come together for an engaging course on advanced mediation strategies designed for litigators, mediators, in-house counsel, and other dispute resolution professionals. Along with exploring cutting-edge techniques, we will cover essential ethical responsibilities for lawyers and mediators. Participants will also receive a link to the latest Florida Mediation Best Practices Handbook, packed with proven strategies, practical tools, ethics rules, and federal and state mediation forms to strengthen mediation performance and client outcomes. I will participate in an esteemed panel of experienced trial lawyers, a United States Magistrate Judge and veteran mediator colleagues. We will lead a dynamic discussion during breaks in the screening of “The Voice of the Client,” an eye-opening film just produced by the Florida Bar’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Section. Through powerful real-life stories, attendees will gain new perspectives on how clients experience mediation. The session is sure to spark meaningful discussions on preparation, communication, and how mediator techniques impact outcomes, helping participants elevate their mediation practice. Registration information here-- https://flabaradr.com/events/the-ocba-adr-committee-and-the-adr-section-of-the-florida-bar-presents-the-voice-of-the-client/ and direct link-- https://orangecountybar.org/events/register.aspx?id=1995577&itemid=786cc0e9-5ee8-4757-9388-b03a47a76f1c

Practice Playbook Podcast Appearance

So thrilled to be asked to join Susan Guthrie on The Practice Playbook Podcast where we talk about getting back to the basics in what we do in the face of unjustified fears like: "Is AI replacing mediators?" Dispute resolution professionals are likely asking this right now because technology is so rapidly advancing. AI tools are everywhere and virtual practice is the norm. In our conversation, we find AI is not actually replacing mediators. It doesn't replace skill, rather it is helpful to automating scheduling, helping to summarize documents and making more information instantly accessible. What remains human is the mediator’s judgment, presence and ability to guide people through uncertainty. Technology reduces friction, not responsibility. Strong mediators become more visible in this environment. Their preparation is clearer. Their instincts are sharper. Their ability to read people and manage dynamics stands out. Technology does not resolve complex cases, but can help better define them. However, lived experience and intuition are what still drive successful mediation outcomes. AI systems cannot read a room yet! No algorithm can sense hesitation, fear, or strategic posturing in real time. No tool can decide when to push, when to pause, or when silence is doing the work. Those decisions come from vast experience. They come from curiosity and instincts developed over hundreds or thousands of cases. These are not skills that can be automated. They are earned. Mediation is fundamentally a human process. It relies on judgment, trust, and the ability to guide people through uncertainty, none of which can be replaced by technology. More data does not always produce better outcomes. One challenge in today’s mediation environment is the information paradox. Parties have access to more data than ever, yet clarity is often harder to achieve. Excess documentation, poorly timed disclosures, and last-minute revelations can slow progress instead of advancing it. Discernment is perhaps one of the most valuable skills a mediator brings to the room in this age. Knowing what matters, when it matters, and how to use information strategically is not a technical function. It is a professional one. Until real AGI? Give us a listen on the first episode of the new year here-- https://bit.ly/PPP-Lawrence-Kolin